Recent Discussions
Flashblade & Ansible collection
Hello community, We are facing some issues with our FlashBlade when provisioning policies with Ansible. We have updated all the components (py-pure-client and the collection), and we are failing on a simple policy deployment. - name: Test purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy: name: "filesystem_export_policy" enabled: True policy_type: "nfs" at: True client: "mynfsexport.flashblade.local" secure: True security: "sys" permission: "rw" access: "no-squash" fb_url: "{{ fb_host }}" api_token: "{{ fb_api_token }}" The complete stack trace is : The full traceback is: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/user/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1778656887.1852276-3067455-48057529014464/AnsiballZ_purefb_policy.py", line 107, in <module> _ansiballz_main() File "/home/user/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1778656887.1852276-3067455-48057529014464/AnsiballZ_purefb_policy.py", line 99, in _ansiballz_main invoke_module(zipped_mod, temp_path, ANSIBALLZ_PARAMS) File "/home/user/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1778656887.1852276-3067455-48057529014464/AnsiballZ_purefb_policy.py", line 47, in invoke_module runpy.run_module(mod_name='ansible_collections.purestorage.flashblade.plugins.modules.purefb_policy', init_globals=dict(_module_fqn='ansible_collections.purestorage.flashblade.plugins.modules.purefb_policy', _modlib_path=modlib_path), File "<frozen runpy>", line 226, in run_module File "<frozen runpy>", line 98, in _run_module_code File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code File "/opt/tmp/tmp/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload_xaietsz7/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload.zip/ansible_collections/purestorage/flashblade/plugins/modules/purefb_policy.py", line 4233, in <module> File "/opt/tmp/tmp/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload_xaietsz7/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload.zip/ansible_collections/purestorage/flashblade/plugins/modules/purefb_policy.py", line 4008, in main File "/opt/tmp/tmp/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload_xaietsz7/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload.zip/ansible_collections/purestorage/flashblade/plugins/modules/purefb_policy.py", line 2392, in update_nfs_policy AttributeError: 'ErrorResponse' object has no attribute 'items' fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => { "changed": false, "module_stderr": "Traceback (most recent call last):\n File \"/home/user/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1778656887.1852276-3067455-48057529014464/AnsiballZ_purefb_policy.py\", line 107, in <module>\n _ansiballz_main()\n File \"/home/user/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1778656887.1852276-3067455-48057529014464/AnsiballZ_purefb_policy.py\", line 99, in _ansiballz_main\n invoke_module(zipped_mod, temp_path, ANSIBALLZ_PARAMS)\n File \"/home/user/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1778656887.1852276-3067455-48057529014464/AnsiballZ_purefb_policy.py\", line 47, in invoke_module\n runpy.run_module(mod_name='ansible_collections.purestorage.flashblade.plugins.modules.purefb_policy', init_globals=dict(_module_fqn='ansible_collections.purestorage.flashblade.plugins.modules.purefb_policy', _modlib_path=modlib_path),\n File \"<frozen runpy>\", line 226, in run_module\n File \"<frozen runpy>\", line 98, in _run_module_code\n File \"<frozen runpy>\", line 88, in _run_code\n File \"/opt/tmp/tmp/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload_xaietsz7/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload.zip/ansible_collections/purestorage/flashblade/plugins/modules/purefb_policy.py\", line 4233, in <module>\n File \"/opt/tmp/tmp/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload_xaietsz7/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload.zip/ansible_collections/purestorage/flashblade/plugins/modules/purefb_policy.py\", line 4008, in main\n File \"/opt/tmp/tmp/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload_xaietsz7/ansible_purestorage.flashblade.purefb_policy_payload.zip/ansible_collections/purestorage/flashblade/plugins/modules/purefb_policy.py\", line 2392, in update_nfs_policy\nAttributeError: 'ErrorResponse' object has no attribute 'items'\n", "module_stdout": "", "msg": "MODULE FAILURE: No start of json char found\nSee stdout/stderr for the exact error", "rc": 1 } If the policy is already set, the playbook runs perfectly fine. The problem occurs when a new policy is injected. However, we have to install the collection from GitHub. It seems that the artifact built and installed by Ansible Galaxy is not correct. Some commits are not propagated. For example, with the FlashBlade collection 1.24 (installed from Galaxy), we have: >>> from pypureclient.flashblade import ( ... PolicyRuleObjectAccessCondition, ... PolicyRuleObjectAccessPost, ... PolicyRuleObjectAccess, ... NfsExportPolicy, ... NfsExportPolicyRule, ... Policy, ... PolicyPatch, ... PolicyRule, ... SmbSharePolicyRule, ... SmbSharePolicy, ... SmbClientPolicyRule, ... SmbClientPolicy, ... ObjectStoreAccessPolicyPost, ... NetworkAccessPolicy, ... NetworkAccessPolicyRule, ... WormDataPolicy, ... ) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "/home/user/conda/envs/ansible/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pypureclient/flashblade/__init__.py", line 40, in __getattr__ raise ImportError(f'module {__package__} has no attribute {name}') ImportError: module pypureclient.flashblade has no attribute PolicyPatch We have compared the archive from GitHub and there are many differences with the upstream collection code. To help, find my my env package : Package Version ----------------- ----------- annotated-types 0.7.0 ansible-core 2.18.5 bcrypt 5.0.0 certifi 2026.4.22 cffi 2.0.0 cryptography 44.0.0 dnspython 2.8.0 invoke 3.0.3 Jinja2 3.1.4 MarkupSafe 2.1.1 packaging 24.1 paramiko 5.0.0 pip 24.2 py-pure-client 1.88.0 pycparser 2.22 pydantic 2.13.4 pydantic_core 2.46.4 PyJWT 2.12.1 PyNaCl 1.6.2 python-dateutil 2.9.0.post0 PyYAML 6.0.2 resolvelib 1.0.1 setuptools 75.8.2 six 1.17.0 typing_extensions 4.15.0 typing-inspection 0.4.2 urllib3 2.7.0 wheel 0.45.0 And our flashblades are running the Purity//FB 4.6.9. If anyone has a lead to help us get our Ansible back up and running, I thank them in advance. We appreciate your help. Matthmdaniel2 months agoDay Hiker II768Views0likes10Comments- 392Views4likes2Comments
Flashblade with Splunk OTEL
Hi Team, I have FBS100 in lab environment and Splunk Observability cloud. Done integration on FB end and I got the test results showing as integrated. But somehow the test metrics are not getting populated in Splunk cloud portal. Q1- As per documentation it states adding ingest endpoint of Splunk but only API endpoints works? Does documenation needs an update? Q2 - Is OTEL collector working natively in Purity has been blessed by OTEL vendors like Splunk? Thanksvivrao28 days agoDay Hiker I233Views1like1CommentFlashblade and Veeam
Hi everyone, we're exploring the possibilities to include Flashblade into our Veeam infrastructure. A few questions still remain: Is there a plan to implement the Veeam SOSAPI, or will there - for the foreseeable future - "only" be native S3? Are there any concerns or limitations regarding V13 with VSA/VIA deployments? Thanks in advance.Solved406Views0likes1CommentFlashblade S3 Integration with VMware vCloud
Does anyone know if Pure has an integration with Flashblade and vCloud or is maybe working on one? Dell and Hitachi seem to have extensions for vCloud but nothing for Pure. We want to support Pure Object user consumption through the vCloud model.Solvedcchilderhose1 year agoDay Hiker III484Views0likes1Comment