Countdown to VMware Explore 2026
Just about three weeks until VMware Explore 2026 kicks off in Las Vegas (Aug. 31 - Sept. 3). Everpure will be there with our VMware experts on hand to help answer your questions, bounce ideas off, learn what's coming next and more. Everpure is deeply committed to continuing joint development on VMware and continuing to enhance our industry leading VMware support and features. If you want to ensure you get some quality time with Everpure, please visit the event landing page where you can sign up for a meeting. We'll see you there! Sessions Everpure has two sessions at Explore. Sign up today! Monday, August 31, 10:30am Zero RPO and RTO, Full Speed: ActiveCluster with NVMe-oF on VCF Speaker: Alex Carver, Senior Technical Product Specialist Location: The Hub Theater Your most demanding VMware vSphere workloads no longer have to choose between NVMe performance and zero-RPO protection. Learn how Everpure combines ActiveCluster with NVMe-oF in VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1 to deliver synchronous replication for mission-critical workloads across NVMe/TCP and NVMe/Fibre Channel. Tuesday, September 1, 11:30am Anywhere VCF Runs, Your Data Follows: Hybrid Mobility with Everpure Speaker: Alex Carver, Senior Technical Product Specialist What if your move from VMware vSphere 8 to VMware Cloud Foundation 9 didn't lock you into one path, one platform, or one cloud? See how Everpure enables consistent data services, bidirectional workload mobility, and resilient hybrid VCF architectures across on-premise and cloud environments.128Views0likes0CommentsNavigating Strategy Shift: Lessons from Virtualization’s "Three Waves"
The enterprise virtualization landscape has evolved through distinct shifts over the years, making long-term infrastructure planning a top priority for IT leaders. In an insightful article on the Everpure Blog, Matt Webb breaks down the Three Waves of competitive and market pressure that have shaped modern virtualization—from early hypervisor competition and the rise of public cloud to recent shifting licensing models. Key takeaways for managing long-term virtualization costs and operations: Infrastructure Change Takes Time: While application development moves rapidly, core infrastructure shifts are deliberate and require extensive lead time. Early planning, often 12 months or more ahead of renewals, is essential. A Refracted Market: There is no single "successor" path. Depending on business goals, organizations are choosing between remaining on their current stack, shifting to the public cloud, adopting alternative hypervisors, or modernizing workloads with containerized virtualization (e.g., KubeVirt). Control the Fundamentals: Unpredictability in software licensing makes optimizing the underlying storage and physical infrastructure one of the most reliable ways to control total cost of ownership (TCO). Whether you're actively evaluating new platforms or optimizing your existing stack, this piece offers a valuable framework for thinking through long-term infrastructure strategy. 📖 Read the full article: Virtualization's Three Waves: Where Do We Go from Here?39Views1like0CommentsFlashArray now supports ActiveCluster over NVMe-oF with VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1
VMware stretch clusters just got an upgrade. 🚀 With VMware Cloud Foundation 9.1, FlashArray ActiveCluster over NVMe-oF enables stretched storage with dispersed namespaces, delivering NVMe performance and zero-RPO metro resiliency for mission-critical workloads. ⚡ Learn how NVMe is redefining stretched storage: https://purefla.sh/4v5ebFD240Views1like0Commentsvasa certs - can they just be removed?
Can someone shed some light on this as it seems overly complex (or at least the docs weave an incorrect thread). Just trying to make sense of whether the VASA certs are or aren't needed for anything other than vVols. As we never got around to actually attempting vVols and they are deprecated anyhow going foward, can they be pruned from the appliances? This page which is referenced from the alerts they spam out way, way too early Alert 220 - VASA Certificates Expiration Alert seems to imply they can be removed, but steps 1-3 show renewing them on the linked page Resetting the VASA Certificates with purecert. thanksSolved2.5KViews0likes5CommentsNVMe-TCP + VMware Design Questions
Q1: In a medium - large datacenter (ie anticipated growth to 500 hosts), would it be a problem to use large subnets (ie 2 x /23 or /22's) to place the initiators + target IPs? All our existing nvme-tcp deployments (which we're having great success with btw) use 2 x /24's, which provides more than enough capacity for the array + a decent sized cluster. But now we're entering into the realms of multiple flasharrays (ie 3 or 4 in a single site) and hundreds of hosts - we'll quickly exhaust a /24 range. Q2: In this site, where we have say 2 x FA-X's an 2 x FA-C's, is it valid to present datastores from all of these arrays over nvme-tcp to a single cluster? With each array / datastore cluster being accessed using the same initiators on the same layer 2's? At what point does it get silly and I need to draw a line and segregate environments? Q3: Is there a capacity limit to the number of client hosts I can have on an array / mapping storage to? (nvm - I think I found the answer to that - looks like it's 1000 nqn's on pretty much all X and C arrays)1KViews1like5CommentsAny movement on Active Cluster with NVMe /TCP?
The last update I can find is from 2 years ago was a "maybe 2025" post. Nothing in the AC FAQ that I can find. Is this going to happen or should we just explore other conectivity options at this point? Servers are UCS with internal FC switching for now, we would like to configure uniform access. Pretty sure VMware isn't going to officially support multiple connection types for the same LUN/device/volume, unless someone knows something different.641Views0likes3Commentsrelationship between clusters and host groups
Due to circumstances beyond my control, over time and several upgrades of vSphere, there is no longer any commonality between the clusters in vSphere and what I see as host groups in the FlashArrays. So, my question is - does the API figure things out one way or another OR is my assumption that in the ideal world the clusters of hosts in VMware should match the host group names and such in Pure land? Basically some folks played shell games and since the zoning allowed it, lots of things don't line up like I once had them. I am unsure of the best way to make them sane again. thanks!Solved969Views1like8CommentsAccelerate Breakout Replay: Pure Storage and VMware Core Storage Best Practices Deep Dive
Join this session to learn Pure Storage + VMware best practices. Get answers to "why" and deployment tips. Speakers: Alex Carver Jason Langer Trevin Hale, Columbia Sportswear https://www.purestorage.com/video/webinars/vmware-core-storage-best-practices-deep-dive/6375804979112.html120Views0likes0CommentsAccelerate Breakout Replay: What's New with VMware, Pure Storage, and You in 2025?
Explore Pure Storage + VMware in 2025: ActiveDR™, ActiveCluster™, vVols, NVMe-oF, NFS, and deep platform integrations. Speakers: Alex Carver David Stevens https://www.purestorage.com/video/webinars/whats-new-vmware-pure-you-2025/6375798298112.html150Views0likes0Comments