Getting Started: 5 Steps to Get the Most Out of the Pure Customer Community
Welcome! You've taken the first step and created an account here. What to do next you ask? Here's five simple steps to take after registering to ensure you're getting the most out of this community. Fill out your Profile: Let the community know who you are! Click on your avatar in the top right corner of this window and select 'My Settings' from that dropdown. Fill in your name, location, and bio information. Plus select from one of several default avatars or upload your own image. Write an Introduction post: Head over to the Social Space and write your intro post. Tell us about yourself, your role at your company, and your goals for participating in this community. What have you been thinking about a lot lately at work? (And we won't shy away from pictures of your pets either!) Follow a couple of Forum areas: Find the products you use most and solution areas you're most focused on in our Forums and be sure to click the bell icon in the upper right of those forums to be sure you get notifications on the latest activity in those areas. If you work in Finance, Healthcare, Public Sector, or Telco there's groups dedicated to the unique needs of your industry areas too. And if you're an open source or automation fan, Cloud Native and Kubernetes devotee, or a Pure Partner, there's dedicated group you can join for each of those areas too. Join your local Pure User Group: Click on Groups in the top nav and select Pure User Groups. (fka FlashCrew) Select your region & find the group for your local area. Click on that group and then click 'Join Group'. This will ensure you hear about any Pure events happening in your local area, including when & where the next meetup is. Pick 3-5 tags to follow: This community makes heavy use of tags. As you browse a forum, you'll notice each thread has tags. That is because we require them for every post. Find the tags most relevant to your interest areas and click the bell icon on those pages so you can keep up to date with the latest posts in those categories, regardless of what forum or group the discussion happens in. Finally, feel free to ask questions! Your friendly admins (bmcdougall and Ludes) are here to answer any questions you have and take suggestions. And we have deputized experts across Pure Storage to be on hand to answer deep technical questions. So don't be shy, there's always someone around to help you out.Pure Certifications
Hey gang, If any of you currently hold a Flash Array certification there is an alternative to retaking the test to renew your cert. The Continuing Pure Education (CPE) program takes into account learning activities and community engagement and contribution hours to renew your FA certification. I just successfully renewed my Flash Array Storage Professional cert by tracking my activities. Below are the details I received from Pure. Customers can earn 1 CPE credit per hour of session attendance at Accelerate, for a maximum of 10 CPEs total (i.e., up to 10 hours of sessions). Sessions must be attended live. I would go ahead and add all the sessions you attended at Accelerate to the CPE_Submission form. Associate-level certifications will auto-renew as long as there is at least one active higher-level certification (e.g., Data Storage Associate will auto-renew anytime a Professional-level cert is renewed). All certifications other than the Data Storage Associate should be renewed separately. At this time, the CPE program only applies to FlashArray-based exams. Non- FA exams may be renewed by retaking the respective test every three years. You should be able to get the CPE submission form from your account team. Once complete email your recertification Log to [email protected] for formal processing.Complexity Creeps. Let’s Audit It Before It Breaks You.
Complexity in IT isn’t built overnight—and it won’t be unwound that way either. This blog walks through a practical, no-fluff approach to auditing and simplifying your IT environment. From building a visibility map of your tools and integrations to prioritizing what to fix, executing cleanly, and proving the value with real metrics—this is about intentional, incremental change. Win big. Choose simplicity.Pure Storage Delivers Critical Cyber Outcomes
“We don’t have storage problems. We have outcome problems.” - Pure customer in a recent cyber briefing No matter what we are buying, what we are buying is a desired outcome. If you buy a car, you are buying some sort of outcome or multiple outcomes. Point A to Point B, comfort, dependability, seat heaters, or if you are like me, a real, live Florida Man, seat coolers! The same is true when solving for cyber outcomes, and often overlooked is a storage foundation to drive cyber resilience. A strong storage foundation improves data security, resilience and recovery. With these characteristics, organizations can recover in hours vs. days. Here are some top cyber resilience outcomes Pure Storage is delivering. Native, Layered Resilience Fast Analytics Rapid Restore Enhanced Visibility We will tackle all of these in this blog space (multi-part post alert!), but let’s start with the native, layered resilience Pure provides customers. Layered Resilience refers to a comprehensive approach to ensuring data protection and recovery through multiple layers of security and redundancy. This architecture is designed to provide robust protection against data loss, corruption, and cyber threats, ensuring business continuity and rapid recovery in the event of a disaster. Why is layered resilience important? Different data needs different protection. My photo collection, while important to me, doesn’t require the same level of protection as critical application data needed to keep the company running. Layered resilience indicates that there needs to be different layers of resilience and recovery. Super critical data needs super critical recovery. We are referring to the applications that are the life-blood of organizations, order processing, patient services or trading applications. These may only account for 5% of your data, but drive 95% of the revenue. Many organizations protect these with high availability which provides excellent resilience against disasters and system outages. But for malicious events, such as ransomware, protection is needed to ensure that recoverable data is available if an attack corrupts or destroys the production data. Scheduled snapshots can protect that data from the time the data is born. Little baby data. Protect the baby! Pure Snapshots are a critical feature, providing efficient, zero-footprint copies of data that can be quickly created and restored, ensuring data protection and business continuity. Pure snapshots are optimized for data reduction, ensuring minimal space consumption. This is achieved through global data reduction technologies that compress and deduplicate data, making snapshots space-efficient. They are designed to be simple and flexible, with zero performance overhead and the ability to create tens of thousands of snapshots instantly. They are also integrated with Pure1 (part of our Enhanced Visibility discussion) for enhanced visibility, management and security, reducing the need for complex orchestration and manual intervention. Snapshots can be used to create new volumes with full capabilities, allowing for mounting, reading, writing, and further snapshotting without dependencies on one another. This flexibility supports various use cases, including point-in-time restores and data recovery. In events that require clean recovery, and secure recovery at that, it would be much more desirable to leverage snapshots for recovery, where you could scan and determine cleanliness and safeness, often in parallel efforts and the reset time for going to an earlier period of time is a matter of seconds rather than days. But not even these amazing local snapshots are enough. What if your local site is rendered unavailable for some reason? Do you have control of your data to be able to recover in that scenario? Replicating those local snapshots to a second site could enable more flexibility in recovery. We have had customers leverage our High Availability solution (ActiveCluster) across sites and then engage snapshots and asynchronous replication to a third site as a part of their recovery plan. Data that requires extended retention and granularity is typically handled by a data control plane application that will stream a backup copy to a repository. This is usually a last line of defense in case of an event, as the recovery time objective is longer when considering a streaming recovery of 50%, 75%, or 100% of a data center. Still, this is a layer of resiliency that a comprehensive plan should account for. And if these repositories are on Pure Storage, these also can be protected by SafeMode methodologies and other security measures such as Object Lock API, Freeze Locked Objects, and WORM compliance. And most importantly, this last line of defense can be supercharged for recovery by the predictable, performant platform Pure provides. Some outcomes of this layer of resilience involves Isolated Recovery Environments to incorporate even security and create those Clean Rooms to isolate recovery to ensure you will not re-introduce the event origin back into production. In these solutions, the speed benefits that Pure provides is critical to making these designs a reality. Of course, the final frontier is the archive layer. This is a part of the plan that usually falls into compliance SLA, where data is required to be maintained for longer periods of time. Still, more and more, there are performance and warm data requirements for even these data sets, where AI and other queries can benefit from even the oldest of data. One never knows what layer of resilience is required for any single event. Having the best possible resilience enables any company to recover, and recover quickly, from an attack. But native resilience is just one of the outcomes we deliver. Come back to read how we are delivering fast analytics outcomes in an environment that seeks to discover anomalies as fast as possible. Exit Question: How resilient is your data today? Jason Walker is a technical strategy director for cyber related areas at Pure Storage and a real, live, Florida Man. No animals or humans were injured in the creation of this post.Denver Pure User Group (PUG) meetup
Details Our next Denver Pure User Group (PUG) meetup is all about protecting and securing all your data. Join us to connect, learn, and engage with your local IT peers around strategies to battle ransomware, speed up recovery, and prepare business continuity solutions for disaster recovery. Discuss a tiered resiliency architecture and strategies to implement before, during, and after a cyber incident. Topic : Cyber Resilience and 1touch Venue Prost Brewing Co. - Northglenn Biergarten 351 W 104th Ave Unit A Northglenn, CO, 80234 Speaker Scott Taylor Director, Cyber Resilience, Field Solutions Architect Everpure Doug Gregory Area Vice President, 1touch Everpure Register here!EBC ya at Pure HQ
What a whirlwind! I just made it home a few short hours ago after a quick, unexpected, and incredibly rewarding trip to Pure's Headquarters in Santa Clara. The reason for my side quest?... to support a whole day of customer meetings at our Executive Briefing Center or as we say in the biz, EBC. EBCs are one of the perks of my job. They give me an excuse to see all of my friend and colleagues at Pure's HQ, I get to talk about cool stuff, I get to hear about the cool stuff OTHER folks are working on; but probably the best is that I get to spend all day really getting to know one of Pure's customers (or sometimes a future customer) on a very deep level. And we host a LOT of them at Pure. Most EBCs I'm invited to are a highly structured affair. Our amazing EBC team at Pure Storage are absolute pros when it comes to creating engaging agendas, inviting all of the best speakers, and in general just creating an experience that makes our visiting customers feel like the honored guests that they are. This was not like most EBCs. On Friday I received a phone call from one of our Field CTOs that went something like this. "JD, can you be in Santa Clara on Wednesday? We've had a sudden change in roster for an EBC and I need someone to help me run the day 1 agenda." Turns out we had a customer CTO and CIO decide to join at the last minute but our schedule was full of deep dive technical content that was probably not going to hit the mark with them. Well the good news is that everyone rallied to the cause and in the end we had a fantastic set of meetings that day before continuing the discussions at the 650 Tavern (yeah, Pure HQ has it's own tavern where the intro theme from Cheers plays every time you order a drink). By the end of the day I felt I had made several new friends. So what made this such a great event? I wanted to write this post to share some of my own insights that you can hopefully bring to your next EBC, wether you're a Pure account team or a visiting customer. First, and probably most important is to understand the personas of the attendees. Are we hosting all C-level execs or is a mix of executives and technical folks? In my story above we thought we knew the personas but we got thrown a curve ball at the last minute. Clearly setting expectations for what you want out of the EBC can make all of the difference. Are you a C-level who wants to build relationships and better understand the company vision and strategic initiatives? Are you an IT architect who wants to hear from our thought leaders and subject matter experts? Having this clearly defined as you're crafting an agenda and inviting presenters can ensure you build an agenda that meets the needs of everyone in the room. Second, be prepared! I was a little late to the party for this EBC and I knew that it would be so much more impactful if my discussions and presentations came from a place of understanding. So I reached out to our internal System Engineering Center of Excellence and asked that they send me a Pure Value Review (aka PVR) for this account. If you're a current Pure customer I'm sure you've seen this document before; likely presented by your local System Engineer. It contains a great deal of useful information pulled from Pure 1, our cloud-based as-a-service data management platform. I was able to gain some great insights into the environment including things like what kinds of capabilities were enabled; what were the most recent support cases, and what kind of systems and environments were being supported. While this document as a whole is probably a little to deep for a non-technical audience; it empowered me with a deeper understanding of the customer from which to base my questions and discussions early in the day. And boy was it powerful! I called back to facts I had learned in this report several times throughout the day. Lastly, ask lots of questions. The EBC is a highly customized experience. I wouldn't give the same presentation or have the same discussion with every customer. By learning about my guests I was able to weave specific elements of their business and their goals into the conversation at several points. By the end we were engaging in a dynamic discussion of the future for both companies and how we would continue to work together as partners sharing in each-others success. In my role as a leader at Pure there are few things that give me more pleasure than building new relationships with our customers. I can't wait for the next EBC and who knows; maybe I'll see you there.When Data Becomes the Mission
Why state and local government, cities, and research universities are reorganizing infrastructure around data itself If you remember one thing from this article: infrastructure used to organize around applications. Increasingly, now it organizes around data. If you spend enough time around enterprise infrastructure, you start to notice something about how conversations begin. Someone asks about storage. Not in a philosophical way. In a practical way. How much capacity do we have left? What’s the refresh cycle? Is this staying on premises or moving to cloud? What’s the backup strategy? For years, that framing made perfect sense. Infrastructure was the foundation, and the job of infrastructure teams was to keep the lights on and the foundation solid. But lately, in conversations with customers across state and local government, municipalities, cities, and universities, something feels different. Because eventually someone says something like this: “We have this data… but we can’t actually use it.” And that is when the real conversation begins. Why the public sector reveals the truth about data There’s a perspective I heard recently that stuck with me. The public sector isn’t a niche market. It’s a microcosm of the entire enterprise technology world. At first that sounds counterintuitive. The stereotype is that government IT has been quietly living under a rock since the previous century, next to a beige server and a stack of COBOL manuals. But if you look closely, the opposite is true. State agencies, cities, and research institutions operate in environments that combine nearly every architectural challenge the private sector faces — all at once. Massive datasets Highly distributed users Strict security requirements Long retention policies Global collaboration And an absolute requirement that systems remain available when people need them most. In other words, the public sector experiences the full spectrum of data challenges simultaneously. If you want to stress-test a data architecture, put it inside government. Think about it. A state government may run thousands of systems across dozens of agencies, each serving different missions but increasingly sharing the same underlying data. A city manages infrastructure at the physical edge of society — traffic, water, SCADA, emergency services — where real-time decisions depend on accurate information. Universities generate some of the largest research datasets on earth while collaborating across institutions and countries. Each of these environments demands something slightly different from infrastructure. But they all demand the same thing from data: Security. Integrity. Mobility. Context. Availability. And when those requirements collide in one environment, something interesting happens. The solutions that work there tend to work everywhere. A laboratory for the modern data enterprise This is why many technology leaders quietly view the public sector as something more than a vertical market. It’s a laboratory for enterprise-scale data architecture. If a platform can operate in a world where: sensitive personal data must remain protected • systems span thousands of locations • regulatory oversight is constant • and uptime has real public consequences …then that architecture will almost certainly succeed in commercial environments. Banks, manufacturers, healthcare providers, and global enterprises face the same challenges. Just rarely all at once. Government simply compresses those problems into a single environment. Solve the data problem for government, and you solve it for the enterprise. That’s one reason the shift toward data-centric platforms is becoming so important. When organizations treat infrastructure as a place to store files, they solve only a small part of the problem. But when they treat data as the central operational asset — something that must be understood, governed, protected, and made usable across environments — the architecture begins to look very different. And the public sector, with all its complexity, becomes the place where those architectures are tested first. Which brings us back to the shift we’re seeing across the industry. Because once you start looking at infrastructure through the lens of data itself, something else becomes obvious. The center of gravity has moved. When multiple systems depend on the same dataset, the data becomes part of the operating foundation. And once that happens, moving it — or even restructuring it — becomes dramatically harder. Which brings us to the concept that explains a lot of what is happening right now. The quiet physics of data gravity The first time I heard the term “data gravity” wasn’t in a conference keynote or a vendor presentation. It was in 2015, when a recruiter from a startup called DataGravity (now Anomalo) reached out and asked if I would be interested in interviewing. At the time, the idea sounded fascinating — and slightly theoretical. The company was built around the premise that data itself was becoming the most valuable asset in the data center, and that infrastructure needed to understand the content, context, and behavior of data, not just store it. The name alone hinted at something deeper: the idea that as datasets grow, they start exerting a kind of gravitational pull on the systems around them. Back then, it felt like an interesting concept. Today it feels like a description of reality. The term “data gravity” itself was introduced by Dave McCrory back in 2010, and it turns out to be a remarkably accurate way to describe modern infrastructure. Dave McCrory Blog The idea is simple. As datasets grow, they become harder to move. More applications depend on them. More workflows connect to them. More policies govern them. Eventually, the architecture starts organizing around the data itself. Not because someone designed it that way. Because the physics of large systems leave you very little choice. Imagine trying to relocate a state Medicaid dataset that has been integrated with multiple benefit programs, identity verification systems, and fraud detection tools. Technically possible? Sure. Operationally trivial? Not even close. The larger and more interconnected the dataset becomes, the stronger its gravitational pull. Compute moves closer to the data. Applications move closer to the data. Infrastructure reorganizes around the data. This is why organizations that once talked primarily about storage capacity are now talking about data platforms. The center of gravity moved. When data stops being passive The moment data becomes operational, everything changes. For years, most organizations treated data as something that accumulated quietly inside systems. Applications produced it. Storage kept it safe. Backups made sure it could be restored. But that model starts to break down when the data itself becomes part of real-time decision making. You can see this most clearly in environments that generate enormous volumes of information. Cities now run infrastructure that continuously streams telemetry — traffic sensors, utility meters, environmental monitors, emergency response platforms. A water meter that once reported usage once a month might now generate thousands of readings per year. A traffic system that once relied on static timing can adapt dynamically to real-time conditions. Each improvement creates more data. More importantly, it creates operational dependence on that data. Universities experience the same phenomenon in a different form. Research environments produce extraordinary datasets across genomics, climate science, and artificial intelligence. Sequencing a single human genome generates roughly 100 gigabytes of raw data, and large research programs may create terabytes or petabytes of new information every week. In those environments the challenge isn’t just storing data. It’s feeding it fast enough to the systems that depend on it. Modern research clusters and GPU environments can process enormous volumes of information, but only if the underlying data pipeline keeps up. When storage cannot deliver data fast enough, expensive compute resources sit idle and discovery slows down. And that reveals an important truth about modern infrastructure. When systems depend on data in real time, the question stops being where the infrastructure lives. The question becomes whether the data is available, trustworthy, and recoverable. That distinction also explains why ransomware has become so disruptive to public institutions. Attackers understand that the real leverage is not the servers or the network. It’s the data. When access to data disappears, the services built on top of it disappear as well. Which brings us back to the deeper shift happening across the industry. If data has become this central to operations, services, and discovery, then managing it as a passive byproduct of infrastructure is no longer enough. Infrastructure alone is no longer the strategic layer. The strategic layer is the data itself. Organizations still need performance, availability, and resilience. Those fundamentals have not changed. What has changed is the expectation that infrastructure should also help organizations understand, govern, protect, and use their data more effectively. That is a very different problem than simply storing it. And it is the reason the conversation is evolving from storage management to data management platforms. The real punch line Public sector organizations didn’t set out to become data enterprises. Over time the data accumulated. Then the dependencies formed. And eventually everything started orbiting the datasets that mattered most. Data has gravity. Data has risk. Data has power. Infrastructure still matters. But increasingly, the real mission is something else entirely. The mission is the data. Appreciate you reading. Dmitry Gorbatov © 2025 Dmitry Gorbatov | #dmitrywashere
Ask Us Everything: Pure Storage + Nutanix — What the Community Really Wanted to Know
The January Ask Us Everything (AUE) session tackled one of the hottest topics in infrastructure right now: what Pure Storage and Nutanix are doing together—and what that means for our customers. Judging by the volume and depth of questions, it’s clear that many of you are actively evaluating next-generation virtualization options and want real answers, not marketing slides. With Cody Hosterman (Sr Director Product Management, Pure Storage), Thomas Brown (Field CTO, Nutanix), myself - Joe Houghes (Field Solutions Architect, Pure Storage), and our host Don Poorman (Technical Evangelist, Pure Storage), the conversation went deep into architecture, migration realities, and the practical problems this joint solution is designed to solve. Here are the biggest takeaways from what attendees asked—and what they learned. This is joint engineering, not just “interoperability” One of the most important clarifications came early: this isn’t a case of “here’s a LUN, good luck.” Nutanix has natively integrated Pure Storage FlashArray APIs directly into the Nutanix stack. That means: No plugins to install No bolt-on frameworks to manage No separate operational silos In Prism, the Nutanix management plane, Pure Storage behaves like a first-class storage backend. Snapshots, protection, provisioning, and automation are driven from Nutanix, while Pure Storage delivers its strengths—performance, data reduction, SafeMode, and simplicity—under the covers. NVMe/TCP support is a deliberate, forward-looking choice Several attendees asked why Fibre Channel or legacy protocols weren’t the focus. The answer: this solution is built for where infrastructure is going, not where it’s been. By standardizing on NVMe/TCP over Ethernet, Pure and Nutanix: Avoid decades of SCSI and FC tech debt Enable massive bandwidth scalability (100G, 400G, and beyond) Lay the groundwork for modern security features like TLS and in-band authentication This is a design meant to still make sense 10 years from now. Object-style vDisks eliminate old datastore limits A recurring “aha” moment came when attendees learned how vDisks are implemented. Instead of traditional filesystem-based datastores (with all their historical limits), each virtual disk maps directly to a Pure Storage volume. What that unlocks: Petabyte-scale virtual disks (no more 64TB ceilings) No datastore gymnastics to scale performance No artificial limits inherited from legacy file systems This felt especially relevant for customers running large databases, analytics platforms, or fast-growing enterprise apps. HCI isn’t going away—this complements it A key question from the audience: Does this replace Nutanix HCI? The answer was a clear no. Nutanix HCI still makes perfect sense for many workloads. But when customers: Need to scale storage independently of compute Have performance-heavy or capacity-dense workloads Want an “apples-to-apples” replacement for traditional VMware + external storage …Pure Storage + Nutanix provides a clean alternative without forcing architectural compromises. Migration is real, and the hard parts were addressed honestly Migration questions dominated the session—and the tone was refreshingly pragmatic. Attendees learned: Nutanix Move is fully supported and preserves Purity’s data reduction–which makes this a zero-cost migration in terms of storage capacity VMware NSX rules can be translated into Nutanix Flow during migration Backup tools (Veeam, Rubrik, Commvault, Cohesity, etc.) continue to work without re-engineering or changes in backup operations Most migration risk doesn’t lie in the hypervisor—it’s overlooked third-party dependencies The guidance was consistent: plan carefully, take stock of any dependencies, and don’t rush a wholesale cutover just to meet an artificial deadline. No user ever wants to be forced to do that. Operational simplicity is a major design goal A subtle but powerful theme emerged: you don’t need to tune this solution. VMware users often ask about “nerd knobs” and the need to tweak things to get them working right. In this solution, they’re mostly gone—and intentionally so. Best practices for queue depths, multipathing, performance tuning and more are already baked into the platform by the joint engineering teams. Improvements are managed through upgrades, eliminating the need for manual scripting or implementing performance tweaks for a "snowflake" deployment. The result of this best-of-breed, jointly-engineered solution is consistency, predictability, and easier support—especially during migrations–so that you can focus on the work that makes your business run. The roadmap is active—and community feedback matters This solution was not positioned as “done and dusted.” The GA release is the foundation, not the finish line. Capabilities like Kubernetes support, deeper snapshot orchestration, VDI validation, and migration optimizations are all on the roadmap. And importantly: your use cases drive priorities. And the Pure Storage Community is a great place to drop your feedback for the teams! Keep the conversation going This partnership sparked a lot of interest for a reason: it’s not just about changing hypervisors—it’s about modernizing how infrastructure works. If you missed the live session—or want to dive deeper—join the ongoing discussion in the Pure Storage Community: 👉 https://purecommunity.purestorage.com/discussions/virtualization/ask-us-everything-about-pure-storage--nutanix/3634 You’ll find Pure Storage and Nutanix experts answering follow-ups, clarifying edge cases, and sharing lessons learned from real deployments. While you’re there, be sure to check out past Ask Us Everything events—they’re packed with practical, practitioner-level insights.Pure's Founding 15 Architectural Decisions
When Coz and team set out to build the first Pure storage system they had a mission to "fix everything that was wrong with data storage." That's a rather bold task if you ask me, and having cut my teeth early in my career deploying and supporting some of the storage systems of the day I can tell you there was plenty to fix. Managing multiple tiers of drive types, RAID decisions, planned maintenance, which compromises to make between features and performance. Then on top of it all once every 4 years or so I would get to start planning a major migration project to retire old hardware and move to the shiny new stuff. I think back to those days and can't help but imaging what kind of projects I could have worked on with all that time wasted RMAing the weekly pile of failed HDDs. HDDs that by the way were typically just reset and sent right back out to me as referbs the next time I had a failure. But that's a different blog post. So what are the 15 decisions? These are the foundational architectural principles that drove the early development of Pure's technology and they still remain relevent today. I believe we can draw a direct correlation back to our consistently high NPS score (a measure of customer satisfaction) to these decisions and the impact they have on your day to day life as a data platform admin. When Ludes , andrew , and I sat down to brainstorm our offshoot of The Pure Report we pretty quickly realized this would be a great story to share. It's a story that takes a lot of time, not something that would typically get discussed in an EBC or FlashCrew user group presentation; and the podcasting format gave us the perfect opportunity to finally dig deep into these decisions and share those with the world. We took each of the 15 decisions and did a deep dive episode by episode; unpacking what it meant for our product development and what it means for you in terms of outcomes and experience. We started 3 years ago and tied a bow on it with the final recap episide published at the end of 2024. For those of you who joined us on this journey, thank you. It's been tremendously rewarding; and for those of you just discovering The Pure Report now, I present to you in it's entirety: The 15 Decisions on The Pure Report Podcast. Built in Simplicity Most Efficient Architecture At Scale Consumer Flash (MLC) Data Reduction Stateless Controllers Front End Active/Active and Back End Active/Standby Streamlined Code Paths Immutable, Usable Snapshots Realistic Efficiency Metrics Adaptive Flexible RAID Security & Encryption: All the Data, All the Time Metadata: The Secret Sauce Simple Install & Upgrade Proactive, Predictive Support Non-Disruptive Everything Recap Episode
