Recent Discussions
Everpure will be at Nutanix .NEXT
Hey Nutanix fans! Will you be attending Nutanix .NEXT in Chicago (April 7-9) this year? Everpure will be there, ready to answer all your questions, provide demos, etc. We will be at Booth P8. If you want to schedule a meeting with one of the many technical experts we will have on hand, or one of our executives, please visit our event page and fill out the meeting request form. Hope to see folks there! https://www.purestorage.com/events/nutanix-next-2026.htmlPeter_Eicher1 day agoDay Hiker II2Views0likes0Commentsvasa certs - can they just be removed?
Can someone shed some light on this as it seems overly complex (or at least the docs weave an incorrect thread). Just trying to make sense of whether the VASA certs are or aren't needed for anything other than vVols. As we never got around to actually attempting vVols and they are deprecated anyhow going foward, can they be pruned from the appliances? This page which is referenced from the alerts they spam out way, way too early Alert 220 - VASA Certificates Expiration Alert seems to imply they can be removed, but steps 1-3 show renewing them on the linked page Resetting the VASA Certificates with purecert. thanksdavid_schramm3 days agoDay Hiker III1.3KViews0likes4CommentsAsk Us Everything about Pure Storage + Nutanix
💬 Get ready for our January 2026 edition of Ask Us Everything, this Friday, January 16th at 9 AM Pacific. This month is all about Pure Storage + Nutanix. If you have a burning question, feel free to ask it here early and we'll add it to the list to answer on Friday. Or if we can't get it answered live, our Pure Storage + Nutanix experts can follow up here. thomasbrown​ Cody_Hosterman​ jhoughes​ & dpoorman​ are the experts answering your questions during the conversation and here on the community. See you this Friday! (Oh, and if you haven't registered yet, there's still time!) Or, check out some of these self-serve resources: Solution Brief Pure Report Podcast Pure360 Video Nutanix, Intel, & Pure white paper EDIT: Thanks for joining in! If you have additional burning questions and comments, leave them in the comments below for the team!bmcdougall1 month agoBackpacker I122Views4likes0CommentsProxmox VE
Hi all Hope you're all having a great day. We have several customers going down the Proxmox VE road. One of my colleagues was put onto https://github.com/kolesa-team/pve-purestorage-plugin as a possible solution (as using Pure behind Proxmox (using the native Proxmox release) is not a particularly Pure-like experience. Could someone from Pure comment on the plugin's validity/supportability?richard_raymond1 month agoNovice I748Views5likes5CommentsNVMe-TCP + VMware Design Questions
Q1: In a medium - large datacenter (ie anticipated growth to 500 hosts), would it be a problem to use large subnets (ie 2 x /23 or /22's) to place the initiators + target IPs? All our existing nvme-tcp deployments (which we're having great success with btw) use 2 x /24's, which provides more than enough capacity for the array + a decent sized cluster. But now we're entering into the realms of multiple flasharrays (ie 3 or 4 in a single site) and hundreds of hosts - we'll quickly exhaust a /24 range. Q2: In this site, where we have say 2 x FA-X's an 2 x FA-C's, is it valid to present datastores from all of these arrays over nvme-tcp to a single cluster? With each array / datastore cluster being accessed using the same initiators on the same layer 2's? At what point does it get silly and I need to draw a line and segregate environments? Q3: Is there a capacity limit to the number of client hosts I can have on an array / mapping storage to? (nvm - I think I found the answer to that - looks like it's 1000 nqn's on pretty much all X and C arrays)mrstorey2 months agoDay Hiker II457Views1like5CommentsPure Report Podcast: Nutanix and Pure Storage: Propelling Enterprise Virtualization Forward
Check out the latest edition of the Pure Report podcast where we unpack the GA announcement for the Nutanix and Pure Storage partnership. Hear from Cody_Hosterman​ and Nutanix VP Product Ketan Shah on the technical details of the integration and how this partnership came together.
Ludes3 months agoTrekker III51Views1like0CommentsNutanix and Pure Storage are Changing Virtualization
Big news, virtualization fans! The combined Nutanix + Pure Storage solution is now available. You can read all about it in the blog and get further details on our Nutanix partner page. We’ve been talking to lots of folks about this offering, both Pure users and not, and the consensus is that people are glad to see some new stability being brought to the virtualization world, with a solution from two customer-centric organizations. To give you a sense of the value of using external storage with FlashArray, an early adopter (I’m not at liberty to name them) running a nearly 2 PB database workload will save about 50% on rack space with significant savings on power, cooling and operational costs. Please contact your Pure sales team if you want to learn more about this solution.Peter_Eicher3 months agoDay Hiker II62Views1like0CommentsJoin us for Nutanix IT Unplugged with Isaac Slade
Our friends at Nutanix are sponsering a fun virtual event on Dec. 5 for IT Unplugged featuring a live performance by Isaac Slade, formerly of The Fray. You'll hear from both Nutanix and Pure about our new joint solution, along with some musical fun. Go here for more details and to register: https://event.nutanix.com/itunplugged-december2025?utm_source=PureStoragePeter_Eicher3 months agoDay Hiker II53Views0likes0CommentsAny movement on Active Cluster with NVMe /TCP?
The last update I can find is from 2 years ago was a "maybe 2025" post. Nothing in the AC FAQ that I can find. Is this going to happen or should we just explore other conectivity options at this point? Servers are UCS with internal FC switching for now, we would like to configure uniform access. Pretty sure VMware isn't going to officially support multiple connection types for the same LUN/device/volume, unless someone knows something different.jcrossley3 months agoDay Hiker I308Views0likes3Commentsrelationship between clusters and host groups
Due to circumstances beyond my control, over time and several upgrades of vSphere, there is no longer any commonality between the clusters in vSphere and what I see as host groups in the FlashArrays. So, my question is - does the API figure things out one way or another OR is my assumption that in the ideal world the clusters of hosts in VMware should match the host group names and such in Pure land? Basically some folks played shell games and since the zoning allowed it, lots of things don't line up like I once had them. I am unsure of the best way to make them sane again. thanks!Solveddavid_schramm3 months agoDay Hiker III492Views1like8Comments